Skip to main content
  • Systematic Review
  • Open access
  • Published:

Prophylactic corticosteroids for infants undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Abstract

Background

Prophylactic corticosteroids have been widely used to mitigate the inflammatory response induced by cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). However, the impact of this treatment on clinically important outcomes in infants remains uncertain.

Methods

We systematically searched databases (Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), Clinical Trials Registry, and Google Scholar from inception to March 1, 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in which infants undergoing on-pump cardiac surgery received prophylactic corticosteroids or placebo were selected. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration risk-of-bias tool. Considering clinical heterogeneity between studies, the random-effects model was used for analysis. Subgroup analyses on the neonatal studies and sensitivity analyses by the leave-one-out method were also conducted.

Results

Eight RCTs comprising 1,920 patients were included. Our analysis suggested no significant difference in postoperative mortality (2.1% vs. 3.3%, risk ratio (RR) = 0.71, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.41, 1.21]). Significantly increased insulin treatment in infants (19.0% vs. 6.5%, RR = 2.78, 95% CI [2.05, 3.77]) and significantly reduced duration of mechanical ventilation in neonates (mean difference = -22.28 h, 95% CI [-42.58, -1.97]) were observed in the corticosteroids group. There were no differences between groups for postoperative acute kidney injury, cardiac arrest, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support, low cardiac output syndrome, neurologic events, infection, or length of postoperative intensive care unit stay.

Conclusions

Current evidence does not support the routine prophylactic use of corticosteroids in infants undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB. Further large-scale research is needed to investigate the optimal agent, dosing regimen, and specific impact on various types of cardiac surgery.

Trial registration

This systematic review and meta-analysis was registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42023400176).

Peer Review reports

Background

Outcomes for infants undergoing cardiac surgery have improved significantly over the past several decades with advances in surgical and anesthesia techniques [1,2,3,4]. However, infants undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) remain at high risk of death, serious complications, and prolonged length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay [5,6,7].

The severe systemic inflammatory response resulting from CPB, which can lead to capillary leakage and organ dysfunction, has been recognized as a major contributor to adverse outcomes [8,9,10,11,12]. Corticosteroids, steroid hormones secreted by the adrenal glands, have been shown to have anti-inflammatory effects in cardiac surgery patients [13,14,15]. For decades, synthetic corticosteroids such as methylprednisolone, dexamethasone, and hydrocortisone have been routinely administered in many centers to mitigate the CPB-induced systemic inflammatory response [16, 17]. However, this practice has also raised concerns due to the uncertain evidence of beneficial effects on clinically relevant outcomes.

The routine use of prophylactic steroids for adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery is not recommended by current guidelines, but a more pronounced inflammatory response in younger patients and potentially beneficial effects of corticosteroids are suggested [18]. However, recommendations for pediatric and infant patients are lacking. Previous studies and meta-analyses have failed to demonstrate significant benefits of prophylactic corticosteroids use in adults and children undergoing on-pump cardiac surgery [19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27]. A recent meta-analysis by Losiggio et al. revealed a significant reduction in mortality and postoperative inotropic score in patients younger than 65 years old who received prophylactic corticosteroids [28]. To the best of our knowledge, infants have not been exclusively evaluated in previous meta-analyses. In recent years, several large-scale randomized controlled trials (RCTs) regarding the prophylactic use of corticosteroids in infants undergoing cardiac surgery have been conducted [16, 29, 30]. These studies have revealed the uncertain influence of corticosteroids on infants and possible confounders, such as age, type of surgery, and CPB strategy and duration [16, 29, 30].

Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis by analyzing all relevant RCTs to investigate the impact of prophylactic corticosteroids on infants submitted to cardiac surgery with CPB. The null hypothesis stated that there would be no significant difference in perioperative outcomes between infants treated with prophylactic corticosteroids and those treated with placebo.

Methods

We reported this systematic review and meta-analysis according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines [31]. Before our study started, the protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) database (registration number: CRD42023400176).

Search strategy and selection criteria

We systematically searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases from inception to March 1, 2024. Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms and free text terms related to corticosteroids, infants, and cardiac surgery were selected. Search strategies are shown in Supplementary Material 1. We also searched the Clinical Trials Registry (www.clinicaltrials.gov) and Google Scholar to identify grey literature. In addition, the reference lists of all the included studies were screened to identify additional studies missed from the original electronic search. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) design: randomized controlled trials; (2) population: infants (≤ 12 months) scheduled for cardiac surgery with CPB; (3) intervention: perioperative (preoperative, intraoperative, or postoperative) administration of corticosteroids (methylprednisolone, dexamethasone, hydrocortisone, or other corticosteroids) for prophylactic purposes; (4) control: placebo or none; and (5) outcomes: eligible studies must report at least one of the predetermined outcomes. The primary outcome was in-hospital postoperative mortality. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI), cardiac arrest, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support, low cardiac output syndrome (LCOS), neurologic events, infection, insulin treatment, duration of postoperative mechanical ventilation, and length of postoperative ICU stay. Exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) organ transplantation; (2) corticosteroid administration for other purposes, such as supplement therapy, and allergy treatment; and (3) patients with abnormalities of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis.

Data extraction

Two authors (SYW and YX) independently screened the literature and extracted data using the standard data collection form. A third author (HY) was involved when discrepancies appeared. We extracted the following data: first author, title, journal, year of publication, study design, country, number of enrolled patients, distribution in both groups, patient characteristics, type of surgery, type of corticosteroids, corticosteroid administration regimen, in-hospital postoperative mortality, AKI, cardiac arrest, ECMO support, LCOS, neurologic events, infection, insulin treatment, duration of postoperative mechanical ventilation, and length of postoperative ICU stay. Authors were contacted for missing data relevant to our study.

Risk of bias assessment

Two authors (SYW and YX) independently evaluated the risk of bias in the included studies according to version 2.0 of the Cochrane Collaboration risk-of-bias tool [32]. The following domains were assessed: bias arising from the randomization process, bias due to deviations from intended interventions, bias due to missing outcome data, bias in measurement of the outcome, and bias in selection of the reported result. Each domain was evaluated as having low risk of bias, some concerns, or high risk of bias. The overall risk of bias was assessed based on the judgment for individual domains. Any disagreement was resolved through consultation with a third author (HY).

Quality of evidence assessment

We evaluated the overall quality of evidence for each outcome by the recommendation of the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) system using GRADEpro software [33]. Two authors (SYW and YX) independently assessed the quality of evidence and categorized the certainty of evidence for each outcome as high, moderate, low, or very low. The following five domains participated in the assessment: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness, and publication bias.

Statistical analyses

Dichotomous outcomes were presented as risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI); continuous outcomes were presented as mean differences (MD) and 95% CI. Heterogeneity was measured by using the I2 value for each outcome. Considering clinical heterogeneity between studies, including the type of surgery, duration of aortic cross-clamp, type and dose of corticosteroids used, a random-effects model was used for analysis. For studies with a zero-cell count, the treatment arm continuity correction was used. We performed prespecified subgroup analyses on the studies that enrolled only neonatal patients (≤ 1 month). Sensitivity analyses were also conducted using the leave-one-out method. To evaluate publication bias, both visual assessments using funnel plot asymmetry and statistical analysis using Egger’s regression test were employed. A symmetric funnel plot would suggest the absence of publication bias, while Egger’s test with a p-value less than 0.05 would indicate significant publication bias. All analyses were performed using R software version 4.2.2 (2022 The R Foundation for Statistical Computing).

Results

Study selection and characteristics

The initial electronic search retrieved 2,437 citations from databases (Medline 735; Embase 895; CENTRAL 807), and the grey literature search identified an additional 83 studies. After removing duplicates, 2,066 studies were screened for titles and abstracts. We excluded 1,983 studies based on their titles and abstracts, which led to 83 studies eligible for full-text review. 75 studies were excluded after full-text assessment. Reasons for major excluded articles are provided in Supplementary Material 2. Finally, 8 RCTs with a total of 1,920 participants fulfilled the predefined criteria and were included in our systematic review and meta-analysis (Fig. 1) [14, 16, 29, 30, 34,35,36,37].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow diagram of study selection

All included studies were published between 2005 and 2022, with sample sizes ranging from 20 to 1,200 patients. Among the included studies, three studies were multicenter RCTs, and the remainder were single-center RCTs. All studies included patients ≤ 1 year, with five studies comprising only neonatal patients (≤ 1 month). A variety of corticosteroids were used, including methylprednisolone, dexamethasone, and hydrocortisone. Corticosteroids were administered before surgery in one study, during the surgery in five studies, and during both intraoperative and postoperative periods in two studies. The type of surgery was miscellaneous in four studies and unreported in one study (Table 1).

Table 1 Characteristics of included studies

The risk of bias assessment is shown in Supplementary Material 3. All the included studies had a low risk of bias or some concerns.

The quality of evidence assessment for the included studies is reported in Supplementary Material 4. All decisions to downgrade the certainty of the evidence were justified in footnotes.

Primary outcome

All eight studies reported in-hospital postoperative mortality, with two studies reporting no events. Overall, 1,920 patients were assessed for in-hospital postoperative mortality. Of these, 20 of 948 patients in the corticosteroids group and 32 of 972 patients in the placebo group died after surgery during hospitalization. The in-hospital postoperative mortality between the two groups showed no significant difference (2.1% vs. 3.3%), with RR = 0.71, 95% CI [0.41, 1.21], and I2 = 0% (Fig. 2A). However, the study by Hill et al. included more than half of the population in the analysis. Therefore, a sensitivity analysis was performed to detect the influence of each study on the outcomes. Consequently, removing any single study did not influence the result regarding mortality (Fig. 2B). The subgroup analysis of the neonatal studies also revealed consistent results (five studies: 3.6% vs. 7.1%, RR = 0.68, 95% CI [0.27, 1.75], I2 = 0%) (Fig. 2C). The funnel plot is provided in Supplementary Material 5. Additionally, the Egger’s test suggested that publication bias did not significantly affect our results (P = 0.70).

Fig. 2
figure 2

A Forest plot for the impact of corticosteroids versus placebo on postoperative mortality. B Sensitivity analysis on postoperative mortality by the leave-one-out method. C Subgroup analysis of neonatal studies on postoperative mortality

Secondary outcomes

In-hospital postoperative AKI was reported in four studies. From these, 51 of 894 patients in the corticosteroids group and 64 of 916 patients in the placebo group developed AKI during the postoperative period, with no significant difference between the two groups (5.7% vs. 7.0%, RR = 0.92, 95% CI [0.68, 1.24], I2 = 0%) (Fig. 3A). Furthermore, subgroup analysis of two neonatal studies showed consistent results (Fig. 3B).

Fig. 3
figure 3

A Forest plot for the impact of corticosteroids versus placebo on postoperative AKI. B Subgroup analysis of neonatal studies on postoperative AKI. C Forest plot for the impact of corticosteroids versus placebo on postoperative cardiac arrest. D Forest plot for the impact of corticosteroids versus placebo on postoperative ECMO support

Three studies reported in-hospital postoperative cardiac arrest, and two studies reported in-hospital postoperative ECMO support. No significant difference between corticosteroids and placebo groups was revealed (cardiac arrest: 2.5% vs. 3.8%, RR = 0.67, 95% CI [0.40, 1.14], I2 = 0%; ECMO support: 1.8% vs. 4.7%, RR = 0.41, 95% CI [0.15, 1.10], I2 = 0%) (Fig. 3C, D). The neonatal study by Graham et al. reported consistent results.

In-hospital postoperative LCOS and neurologic events were reported in two studies. There was no significant difference between corticosteroids and placebo groups (LCOS: 10.0% vs. 13.2%, RR = 0.80, 95% CI [0.63, 1.03], I2 = 0%; neurologic events: 2.9% vs. 3.7%, RR = 0.75, 95% CI [0.37, 1.53], I2 = 38%) (Fig. 4A, B).

Fig. 4
figure 4

A Forest plot for the impact of corticosteroids versus placebo on postoperative LCOS. B Forest plot for the impact of corticosteroids versus placebo on postoperative neurologic events. C Forest plot for the impact of corticosteroids versus placebo on postoperative insulin treatment. D Subgroup analysis of neonatal studies on postoperative insulin treatment

Five studies reported postoperative insulin administration. Our analysis found that prophylactic corticosteroid treatment significantly increased postoperative insulin treatment (19.0% vs. 6.5%, RR = 2.78, 95% CI [2.05, 3.77], I2 = 0%) (Fig. 4C). Subgroup analysis of three neonatal studies showed consistent results (Fig. 4D).

In-hospital postoperative infection was reported in five studies. There was no significant difference between corticosteroids and placebo groups (6.0% vs. 5.6%, RR = 1.07, 95% CI [0.74, 1.55], I2 = 0%) (Fig. 5A). The analysis of three neonatal studies also showed consistent results (Fig. 5B).

Fig. 5
figure 5

A Forest plot for the impact of corticosteroids versus placebo on postoperative infection. B Subgroup analysis of neonatal studies on postoperative infection

Duration of postoperative mechanical ventilation was available in five studies. No significant difference was found (MD = -12.17 h, 95% CI [-27.35, 3.02], I2 = 29%) (Fig. 6A). However, the subgroup analysis of neonatal studies suggested a significantly decreased duration of postoperative mechanical ventilation in patients treated with corticosteroids (MD = -22.28 h, 95% CI [-42.58, -1.97], I2 = 0%) (Fig. 6B).

Fig. 6
figure 6

A Forest plot for the impact of corticosteroids versus placebo on duration of postoperative mechanical ventilation (hours). B Subgroup analysis of neonatal studies on duration of postoperative mechanical ventilation (hours). C Forest plot for the impact of corticosteroids versus placebo on length of postoperative ICU stay (days). D Subgroup analysis of neonatal studies on length of postoperative ICU stay (days)

Length of postoperative ICU stay was assessed in six studies, and no significant difference between groups was found (MD = -0.37 days, 95% CI [-0.84, 0.10], I2 = 0%) (Fig. 6C). The subgroup analysis of four neonatal studies revealed consistent results (Fig. 6D).

Discussion

This systematic review and meta-analysis found no significant benefit of prophylactic corticosteroids in infants undergoing on-pump cardiac surgery in terms of in-hospital postoperative mortality, AKI, cardiac arrest, ECMO support, LCOS, neurologic events, infection, or length of ICU stay. However, a significant reduction in the duration of postoperative mechanical ventilation was observed in neonatal studies. Notably, prophylactic corticosteroids were associated with an increased incidence of postoperative insulin treatment.

Corticosteroids have been widely used in infants undergoing cardiac surgery for decades. According to the analysis of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Heart Surgery Database (STS-CHSD), over half of infants undergoing cardiac surgery were treated with corticosteroids during the perioperative period [16]. The mechanism of the potential benefit of corticosteroids on patients undergoing cardiac surgery is mainly related to their anti-inflammatory effect [13,14,15]. However, the benefit of corticosteroids on clinical outcomes remains uncertain. Additionally, potential detrimental effects, such as hyperglycemia, have been reported [38]. Previous studies and meta-analyses on adult and pediatric patients have shown that corticosteroids do not improve clinical outcomes in cardiac surgical patients [19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27]. A significant reduction in mortality and postoperative inotropic score in younger patients who received prophylactic corticosteroids was reported by a recent meta-analysis [28]. Infants are believed to experience more pronounced inflammatory responses to CPB due to immature organ function and a disparity between the CPB circuit size and the patient [39]. The report from STS-CHSD also demonstrated worse clinical outcomes in infants and neonates [6]. Currently, there is a lack of systematic reviews and meta-analyses focusing on prophylactic corticosteroids in infants undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB.

Our analysis demonstrated that prophylactic corticosteroids might not significantly decrease postoperative mortality, AKI, cardiac arrest, ECMO support, neurologic events, infection, or length of ICU stay in infants undergoing cardiac surgery. This result was consistent with the meta-analyses in pediatric patients [22,23,24,25,26,27]. It was noteworthy that three recent meta-analyses conducted subgroup analyses of infants and neonates regarding postoperative mortality, which also showed consistent results with our study [26,27,28]. However, other clinically important outcomes were not reported. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first systematic review and meta-analysis focusing on infants and neonates. Our findings were also in line with recent large-scale RCTs [16, 29, 30]. However, given the low event rates of the aforementioned outcomes, it is possible that the potential beneficial effects provided by corticosteroids are not significant enough to be detected with the current sample size. Thus, further large-scale RCTs are needed, and composite clinical outcomes may be used due to the declining event rates.

The meta-analysis also revealed no significant difference in postoperative LCOS. This finding was not consistent with previous meta-analyses in the pediatric population [26, 27]. The inconsistency may be due to the different ages of the patients. Previous research has identified age as a risk factor for LCOS, with a higher incidence found in younger children [40, 41].

Our analysis detected an increase in postoperative insulin treatment in infants who received prophylactic corticosteroids. Meta-analyses of the pediatric population by Cheema et al. and Takeshita et al. revealed consistent results [26, 27]. This finding indicates a potential increase in the rate of postoperative hyperglycemia and insulin resistance, which might lead to severe complications [42]. However, it is difficult to assess the impact on insulin use, as it may be related to the dose of corticosteroids and the institutional protocol for insulin initiation and use. Prophylactic corticosteroids should be used more cautiously and with more rigorous blood glucose monitoring in infants to ensure their safety.

The subgroup analysis suggested a significantly reduced duration of mechanical ventilation in neonates who received prophylactic corticosteroids. This result was not highlighted in recent RCTs but was in accordance with the meta-analyses involving pediatric patients [25,26,27]. The rationale for this finding is that, in addition to the anti-inflammatory effect on the lungs, corticosteroids could also reduce the incidence of post-extubation stridor and extubation failure [43, 44]. Hence, prophylactic corticosteroids might be considered for neonates at high risk of pulmonary complications and extubation failure.

Our review has several strengths. First, this is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the effect of prophylactic corticosteroids on clinically important outcomes in infants and neonates undergoing on-pump cardiac surgery. In addition, we comprehensively searched and screened literature from three large databases and other sources. Furthermore, this review followed a rigorous methodology. Assessment of eligibility criteria, data extraction, and outcome grading were conducted in duplicate with a high degree of agreement. Finally, subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed to address potential confounding factors.

Limitations are also presented in the study. Firstly, the overall low postoperative mortality and morbidity of AKI, ECMO support, cardiac arrest, and neurologic events may limit the ability to draw definite conclusions with the current sample size. Secondly, there is clinical heterogeneity between studies, including the type of surgery, CPB strategy and duration, duration of aortic cross-clamp, and regimen of corticosteroid administration. Subgroup analysis of these confounders was not performed due to miscellaneous and insufficient data from the included RCTs. The studies by Hill et al. and Bronicki et al. revealed controversy regarding the effect of corticosteroids stratified by the complexity of surgery, and the study by Graham et al. showed that corticosteroids were protective mainly in palliative procedures [16, 22, 29]. This question was unresolved in our analysis, and further studies are needed. Lastly, it is worth noting that the study by Hill et al. contributed to 1,200 out of 1,920 samples, which might have influenced the result [16]. To address this confounder, sensitivity analysis was conducted using the leave-one-out method, which led to consistent results.

Conclusions

In conclusion, our systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated that prophylactic corticosteroids could not improve in-hospital postoperative mortality, AKI, cardiac arrest, ECMO support, LCOS, neurologic events, infection, or length of ICU stay, but might significantly reduce the duration of postoperative mechanical ventilation in neonates undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB. We also observed significantly increased postoperative insulin treatment in infants who received prophylactic corticosteroids. Therefore, current evidence does not support the routine prophylactic use of corticosteroids in infants undergoing on-pump cardiac surgery. We recommend further large-scale research to validate our findings and investigate the most effective agent, optimal dosing regimen, and specific impact on various types of cardiac surgery.

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Abbreviations

CPB:

Cardiopulmonary bypass

ICU:

Intensive care unit

RCT:

Randomized controlled trial

CENTRAL:

Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials

AKI:

Acute kidney injury

ECMO:

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

LCOS:

Low cardiac output syndrome

GRADE:

Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations

RR:

Risk ratio

CI:

Confidence interval

MD:

Mean difference

STS-CHSD:

Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Heart Surgery Database

References

  1. Ma K, He Q, Dou Z, Hou X, Li X, Zhao J, Rao C, Feng Z, Sun K, Chen X, He Y, Zhang H, Li S. Current treatment outcomes of congenital heart disease and future perspectives. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2023;7(7):490–501.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jacobs JP, He X, Mayer JE Jr, Austin EH 3rd, Quintessenza JA, Karl TR, Vricella L, Mavroudis C, O’Brien SM, Pasquali SK, Hill KD, Husain SA, Overman DM, St Louis JD, Han JM, Shahian DM, Cameron D, Jacobs ML. Mortality trends in pediatric and congenital heart surgery: an analysis of the society of thoracic surgeons congenital heart surgery database. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;102(4):1345–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hoashi T, Miyata H, Murakami A, Hirata Y, Hirose K, Matsumura G, Ichikawa H, Sawa Y, Takamoto S. The current trends of mortality following congenital heart surgery: the Japan congenital cardiovascular surgery database. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015;21(2):151–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brown KL, Crowe S, Franklin R, McLean A, Cunningham D, Barron D, Tsang V, Pagel C, Utley M. Trends in 30-day mortality rate and case mix for paediatric cardiac surgery in the UK between 2000 and 2010. Open Heart. 2015;2(1): e000157.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Jacobs ML, O’Brien SM, Jacobs JP, Mavroudis C, Lacour-Gayet F, Pasquali SK, Welke K, Pizarro C, Tsai F, Clarke DR. An empirically based tool for analyzing morbidity associated with operations for congenital heart disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;145(4):1046–57.e1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kumar SR, Gaynor JW, Heuerman H, Mayer JE Jr, Nathan M, O’Brien JE Jr, Pizarro C, Subačius H, Wacker L, Wellnitz C, Eghtesady P. The society of thoracic surgeons congenital heart surgery database: 2023 update on outcomes and research. Ann Thorac Surg. 2024;117(5):904–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Monaco F, Barucco G, Valsecchi G, Licheri M, Nicelli E, Cama E, Pieri M, Dalessandro G, Nakhnoukh C, Galbiati C, Sanchini G, Biselli C, Lembo R, Fominskiy E. Predictors of short- and long-term outcome after open cardiac surgery in a high-volume referral tertiary hospital: the role of surgical team caseload. Signa Vitae. 2022;18(4):24–33.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ashraf SS, Tian Y, Zacharrias S, Cowan D, Martin P, Watterson K. Effects of cardiopulmonary bypass on neonatal and paediatric inflammatory profiles. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1997;12(6):862–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Levy JH, Tanaka KA. Inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;75(2):S715–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wan S, LeClerc JL, Vincent JL. Inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass: mechanisms involved and possible therapeutic strategies. Chest. 1997;112(3):676–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Brudney CS, Gosling P, Manji M. Pulmonary and renal function following cardiopulmonary bypass is associated with systemic capillary leak. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2005;19(2):188–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Neuhof C, Walter O, Dapper F, Bauer J, Zickmann B, Fink E, Tillmanns H, Neuhof H. Bradykinin and histamine generation with generalized enhancement of microvascular permeability in neonates, infants, and children undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2003;4(3):299–304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hall RI, Smith MS, Rocker G. The systemic inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass: pathophysiological, therapeutic, and pharmacological considerations. Anesth Analg. 1997;85(4):766–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Heying R, Wehage E, Schumacher K, Tassani P, Haas F, Lange R, Hess J, Seghaye MC. Dexamethasone pretreatment provides antiinflammatory and myocardial protection in neonatal arterial switch operation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;93(3):869–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bronicki RA, Backer CL, Baden HP, Mavroudis C, Crawford SE, Green TP. Dexamethasone reduces the inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass in children. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;69(5):1490–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hill KD, Kannankeril PJ, Jacobs JP, Baldwin HS, Jacobs ML, O’Brien SM, Bichel DP, Graham EM, Blasiole B, Resheidat A, Husain AS, Kumar SR, Kirchner JL, Gallup DS, Turek JW, Bleiweis M, Mettler B, Benscoter A, Wald E, Karamlou T, Van Bergen AH, Overman D, Eghtesady P, Butts R, Kim JS, Scott JP, Anderson BR, Swartz MF, McConnell PI, Vener DF, Li JS, STRESS Network Investigators. Methylprednisolone for heart surgery in infants - a randomized Controlled Trial. N Engl J Med. 2022;387(23):2138–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Fudulu DP, Schadenberg A, Gibbison B, Jenkins I, Lightman S, Angelini GD, Stoica S. Corticosteroids and other anti-inflammatory strategies in pediatric heart surgery: a national survey of practice. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg. 2018;9(3):289–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sousa-Uva M, Head SJ, Milojevic M, Collet JP, Landoni G, Castella M, Dunning J, Gudbjartsson T, Linker NJ, Sandoval E, Thielmann M, Jeppsson A, Landmesser U. 2017 EACTS Guidelines on perioperative medication in adult cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018;53(1):5–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dvirnik N, Belley-Cote EP, Hanif H, Devereaux PJ, Lamy A, Dieleman JM, Vincent J, Whitlock RP. Steroids in cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2018;120(4):657–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Abbasciano RG, Olivieri GM, Chubsey R, Gatta F, Tyson N, Easwarakumar K, Fudulu DP, Marsico R, Kofler M, Elshafie G, Lai F, Loubani M, Kendall S, Zakkar M, Murphy GJ. Prophylactic corticosteroids for cardiopulmonary bypass in adult cardiac surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024;3(3):CD005566.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ng KT, Van Paassen J, Langan C, Sarode DP, Arbous MS, Alston RP, Dekkers OM. The efficacy and safety of prophylactic corticosteroids for the prevention of adverse outcomes in patients undergoing heart surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020;57(4):620–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bronicki RA, Flores S, Loomba RS, Checchia PA, Pollak U, Villarreal EG, Nickerson P, Graham EM. Impact of corticosteroids on cardiopulmonary bypass induced inflammation in children: a meta-analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2021;112(4):1363–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Scrascia G, Rotunno C, Guida P, Amorese L, Polieri D, Codazzi D, Paparella D. Perioperative steroids administration in pediatric cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials*. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2014;15(5):435–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Li Y, Luo Q, Wu X, Jia Y, Yan F. Perioperative corticosteroid therapy in children undergoing cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Pediatr. 2020;8: 350.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Gibbison B, Villalobos Lizardi JC, Avilés Martínez KI, Fudulu DP, Medina Andrade MA, Pérez-Gaxiola G, Schadenberg AW, Stoica SC, Lightman SL, Angelini GD, Reeves BC. Prophylactic corticosteroids for paediatric heart surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;10(10):CD013101.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Cheema HA, Khan AA, Ahmad AH, Khan AA, Khalid A, Shahid A, Hermis AH, Syed A, Bansal N, Yuki K, Ghelani SJ, Dani SS. Perioperative prophylactic corticosteroids for cardiac surgery in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am Heart J. 2023;266:159–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Takeshita J, Nakajima Y, Tachibana K, Takeuchi M, Shime N. Efficacy of perioperative prophylactic administration of corticosteroids in pediatric cardiac surgeries using cardiopulmonary bypass: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2023;42(6): 101281.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Losiggio R, Lomivorotov V, D’Andria Ursoleo J, Kotani Y, Monaco F, Milojevic M, Yavorovskiy A, Lee TC, Landoni G; Steroids Group. The Effects of Corticosteroids on Survival in Pediatric and Nonelderly Adult Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Studies. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2024;38(11):2783–91.

  29. Graham EM, Martin RH, Buckley JR, Zyblewski SC, Kavarana MN, Bradley SM, Alsoufi B, Mahle WT, Hassid M, Atz AM. Corticosteroid therapy in neonates undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass: randomized controlled trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74(5):659–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Lomivorotov V, Kornilov I, Boboshko V, Shmyrev V, Bondarenko I, Soynov I, Voytov A, Polyanskih S, Strunin O, Bogachev-Prokophiev A, Landoni G, Nigro Neto C, Oliveira Nicolau G, Saurith Izquierdo L, Nogueira Nascimento V, Wen Z, Renjie H, Haibo Z, Bazylev V, Evdokimov M, Sulejmanov S, Chernogrivov A, Ponomarev D. Effect of intraoperative dexamethasone on major complications and mortality among infants undergoing cardiac surgery: the DECISION randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2020;323(24):2485–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(4):264–W264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I, Cates CJ, Cheng HY, Corbett MS, Eldridge SM, Emberson JR, Hernán MA, Hopewell S, Hróbjartsson A, Junqueira DR, Jüni P, Kirkham JJ, Lasserson T, Li T, McAleenan A, Reeves BC, Shepperd S, Shrier I, Stewart LA, Tilling K, White IR, Whiting PF, Higgins JPT. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019;366: l4898.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, Schünemann HJ; GRADE Working Group. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336(7650):924–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ando M, Park IS, Wada N, Takahashi Y. Steroid supplementation: a legitimate pharmacotherapy after neonatal open heart surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;80(5):1672–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Keski-Nisula J, Pesonen E, Olkkola KT, Peltola K, Neuvonen PJ, Tuominen N, Sairanen H, Andersson S, Suominen PK. Methylprednisolone in neonatal cardiac surgery: reduced inflammation without improved clinical outcome. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;95(6):2126–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Keski-Nisula J, Arvola O, Jahnukainen T, Andersson S, Pesonen E. Reduction of Inflammation by High-Dose Methylprednisolone Does not Attenuate Oxidative Stress in Children Undergoing Bidirectional Glenn Procedure With or Without Aortic Arch or Pulmonary Arterial Repair. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2020;34(6):1542–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Suominen PK, Keski-Nisula J, Ojala T, Rautiainen P, Jahnukainen T, Hästbacka J, Neuvonen PJ, Pitkänen O, Niemelä J, Kaskinen A, Salminen J, Lapatto R. Stress-dose corticosteroid versus placebo in neonatal cardiac operations: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017;104(4):1378–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Dieleman JM, Nierich AP, Rosseel PM, van der Maaten JM, Hofland J, Diephuis JC, Schepp RM, Boer C, Moons KG, van Herwerden LA, Tijssen JG, Numan SC, Kalkman CJ, van Dijk D, Dexamethasone for Cardiac Surgery (DECS) Study Group. Intraoperative high-dose dexamethasone for cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2012;308(17):1761–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Ungerleider RM, Shen I. Optimizing response of the neonate and infant to cardiopulmonary bypass. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Annu. 2003;6:140–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Wang P, Fu C, Bai G, Cuan L, Tang X, Jin C, Jin H, Zhu J, Xie C. Risk factors of postoperative low cardiac output syndrome in children with congenital heart disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Pediatr. 2023;10: 954427.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Song B, Dang H, Dong R. Analysis of risk factors of low cardiac output syndrome after congenital heart disease operation: what can we do. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021;16(1):135.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Polito A, Thiagarajan RR, Laussen PC, Gauvreau K, Agus MS, Scheurer MA, Pigula FA, Costello JM. Association between intraoperative and early postoperative glucose levels and adverse outcomes after complex congenital heart surgery. Circulation. 2008;118(22):2235–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Khemani RG, Randolph A, Markovitz B. Corticosteroids for the prevention and treatment of post-extubation stridor in neonates, children and adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;2009(3):CD001000.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Kimura S, Ahn JB, Takahashi M, Kwon S, Papatheodorou S. Effectiveness of corticosteroids for post-extubation stridor and extubation failure in pediatric patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intensive Care. 2020;10(1):155.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the colleagues and statistician at West China Hospital,  Sichuan University for their indispensable help with data collection and data analysis.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SYW and HY were involved in the concept and design of the study. All authors contributed to the acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of the data. SYW and YX were responsible for drafting the manuscript. HY oversaw the project. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hai Yu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, S., Xu, Y. & Yu, H. Prophylactic corticosteroids for infants undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Anesthesiol 24, 385 (2024). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12871-024-02772-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12871-024-02772-7

Keywords