Skip to main content

The effect of cerium oxide on liver in sevoflurane-administered rats: an experimental study

Abstract

Background

Sevoflurane, a commonly used inhalational anesthetic, has been associated with hepatotoxicity, although reports are often isolated. Cerium oxide nanoparticles (CeO₂) are effective free radical scavengers with potential therapeutic applications for oxidative stress-related damage. This study aimed to evaluate the protective effects of CeO₂ on liver damage in sevoflurane-administered rats.

Methods

A total of 24 male Wistar albino rats were randomized into four groups: Control (C), Sevoflurane (S), Cerium Oxide (CeO₂), and Sevoflurane + Cerium Oxide (S + CeO₂). Sevoflurane was administered at 2% concentration with 100% oxygen at 4 L/min for 2 h in Groups S and S + CeO₂. CeO₂ (0.5 mg/kg) was administered intravenously in Groups CeO₂ and S + CeO₂. Biochemical analyses of alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), hemoglobin (Hgb), and hematocrit (Hct) were performed, and liver tissues were examined histopathologically.

Results

Hydropic degeneration and neutrophil infiltration were significantly lower in Group CeO₂ compared to Group S. Group S showed elevated AST and LDH levels compared to the control (p < 0.05). Although AST levels were lower in Groups CeO₂ and S + CeO₂ than in Group S, the difference was not statistically significant. LDH levels were significantly lower in Group S + CeO₂ compared to Group S (p = 0.045). Histopathological examination confirmed reduced liver damage in CeO₂-treated groups.

Conclusions

This study is of significance since it is the first experimental study on the effect of CeO2 on liver damage caused by sevoflurane. Cerium oxide demonstrated potential in mitigating sevoflurane-induced liver damage. Further research is warranted to explore the clinical relevance of CeO₂ in hepatic injury.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Nanotechnology continues to revolutionize various scientific fields, particularly in medicine and biomedical research [1]. The ability to manipulate materials at the nanoscale has led to the development of innovative solutions for drug delivery, imaging, and regenerative medicine [2]. Among nanomaterials, cerium oxide nanoparticles (CeO₂) have gained significant attention due to their remarkable redox properties and potential antioxidant effects [3]. Their unique capacity to alternate between Ce³⁺ and Ce⁴⁺ oxidation states enables continuous scavenging of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [4], making them promising candidates for applications in biomedicine, particularly in conditions related to oxidative stress and inflammation [5].

CeO₂ have demonstrated therapeutic potential in a variety of diseases, including neurodegenerative disorders, cardiovascular diseases, and cancer [6]. Their antioxidant properties have been leveraged to mitigate cellular damage in models of ischemia-reperfusion injury [7], radiation-induced toxicity [8], and inflammatory diseases [9]. Despite these promising effects, research on their hepatoprotective properties remains limited. Given the critical role of oxidative stress in liver diseases, investigating the impact of CeO₂ on hepatic tissue damage is essential for exploring new therapeutic strategies.

Sevoflurane, a widely used volatile anesthetic, has been associated with oxidative stress and hepatotoxic effects in experimental and clinical settings. Although severe hepatotoxicity due to sevoflurane is rare and mostly reported as isolated cases, its increasing use in anesthesia raises concerns about potential liver damage. Approximately 5% of a sevoflurane dose undergoes biotransformation [10], leading to the production of reactive metabolites such as Compound A, which may contribute to hepatotoxicity [11]. Moreover, sevoflurane has been shown to increase cytosolic free calcium (Ca²⁺) levels and generate oxidative stress, leading to hepatocyte necrosis, particularly with repeated exposure [12, 13]. However, the exact mechanisms underlying sevoflurane-induced liver injury remain unclear.

Given the strong antioxidant properties of CeO₂, their potential protective effects against sevoflurane-induced liver damage warrant investigation. This study aims to evaluate the hepatoprotective role of CeO₂ in sevoflurane-administered rats by examining biochemical and histopathological changes in liver tissue. Furthermore, the study will explore the anti-inflammatory and oxidative stress-modulating mechanisms of CeO₂, contributing to a deeper understanding of their biomedical applications.

By assessing the therapeutic potential of CeO₂ in this experimental model, our research provides new insights into their applications in anesthesiology and hepatology. These findings may pave the way for future studies investigating CeO₂ as novel therapeutic agents for preventing anesthesia-induced hepatic injury and other liver-related disorders.

Methods

Study design and setting

This experimental study was performed at the Gazi University Experimental Animals Research Center, Ankara, Turkey, in August 2019. Ethical approval was obtained from the Gazi University Experimental Animals Ethics Committee (Approval Code: G.Ü.ET-12.042, dated 08.07.2019).

Animal model

In the present study, a total of 24 female Wistar albino rats (age, 5 months; weight, 250‑350 g), which were supplied by Gazi University Experimental Animals Research Center, were used. Animals were housed in steel cages under controlled environmental conditions (12-hour light/dark cycles, 20–21 °C temperature, %45–55 humidity) with access to food and water ad libitum. All the experimental procedures were performed according to the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.

The rats were randomly divided into four groups (n = 6 per group): Control, Sevoflurane, Cerium Oxide, Sevoflurane + Cerium Oxide groups.

  1. 1.

    Control Group (C): The control groups were not subjected to any intervention. Rats were anesthetized.

  2. 2.

    Sevoflurane Group (S): The rats were exposed to 2% sevoflurane (Sevorane, Abbott, 250 mL) in 100% oxygen at a flow rate of 4 L/min for 2 h, as described in the study by Arslan et al. [14]. Subsequently, the rats were anesthetized.

  3. 3.

    Cerium Oxide Group (CeO₂): A dose of 0.5 mg/kg CeO₂ (CeO₂ aqueous nanoparticle dispersion, 100 mL; Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) was administered intravenously through the tail vein, as described in the study by Manne et al. [15]. After 150 min, the rats were anesthetized.

  4. 4.

    Sevoflurane + Cerium Oxide Group (S + CeO₂): A dose of 0.5 mg/kg CeO₂ was administered intravenously 30 min prior to sevoflurane exposure. The rats were then exposed to 2% sevoflurane (Sevorane, Abbott, 250 mL) in 100% oxygen at a flow rate of 4 L/min for 2 h. Subsequently, the rats were anesthetized.

Anesthesia and tissue collection

All rats were anesthetized using intramuscular ketamine hydrochloride (50 mg/kg; Ketalar; Parke‑Davis Eczacibasi; Pfizer, Inc.) and xylazine hydrochloride 2% (10 mg/kg; Alfazyne; Ege Vet). The procedure was conducted under a heating lamp with the rats positioned in the supine position. After aseptic preparation of the skin, a midline abdominal incision was performed, exposing the abdominal aorta. All the rats were sacrificed by collecting blood (5‑10 ml) from their abdominal aorta. After heartbeat and respiration ceased, rats were monitored for a further 2 min to confirm death. Following euthanasia, liver tissue samples were collected for biochemical and histopathological evaluation.

Histopathological analysis

Tissue specimens were fixed in 10% formalin for 48 h at room temperature and subsequently embedded in paraffin blocks. Sections of 5 μm thickness were obtained and stained with hematoxylin for 10 min, followed by eosin staining for 5 min at room temperature. Histopathological evaluation and scoring were carried out using light microscopy (Nikon Corporation). All histological assessments were performed by the same pathologist in a blinded manner to ensure consistency and objectivity. Histopathological evaluation included scoring for hydropic degeneration, nuclear pleomorphism, neutrophil and lymphocyte infiltration, and focal necrosis, based on the criteria of Arslan et al. [14].

Biochemical analysis

Blood levels of alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), hemoglobin (Hgb), and hematocrit (Hct) were measured using standard biochemical methods to assess liver function and damage [16].

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA) version 20.0. The Shapiro–Wilk test and Q–Q plot test were used to assess the data distribution. The results were analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis test, followed by Dunn’s test or one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test. The results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and median (interquartile range [IQR]) values. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results

Histopathological findings

Table 1 Histopathological findings (hydropic degeneration, lymphocyte/neutrophil infiltration, necrosis, and pleomorphism) for each group

Liver tissue hydropic degeneration differed significantly among the groups (p = 0.001). Hydropic degeneration was more pronounced in all groups compared to the control group (p < 0.0001). However, it was significantly lower in Group CeO₂ compared to Group S (p = 0.045). Neutrophil infiltration also varied significantly (p = 0.003), with Group CeO₂ showing markedly reduced infiltration compared to Group S (p = 0.037). Lymphocyte infiltration was elevated in all experimental groups relative to the control (p < 0.0001), but no statistically significant differences were observed between Groups S, CeO₂, and S + CeO₂. Necrosis and pleomorphism did not differ significantly between the groups (p = 0.513 and p = 0.554, respectively) (Figure 1, Table 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Representative H&E-stained liver sections (x200 magnification):

(a) Group C: Normal hepatic architecture. (b) Group S: Ground-glass appearance in hepatocytes and nuclear pleomorphism. (c) Group CeO₂: Reduced hydropic degeneration, rare neutrophil and lymphocyte infiltration. (d) Group S + CeO₂: Mild hydropic degeneration, necrosis and pyknotic nuclei in damaged hepatocytes.

Table 2 Biochemical parameters (ALT, AST, LDH, Hgb, Hct) across groups

Significant differences in AST and LDH levels were detected among the groups (p = 0.035 and p = 0.049, respectively). Group S exhibited significantly higher AST levels than Group C (p = 0.033). Although AST levels in Groups CeO₂ and S + CeO₂ were lower than in Group S, the differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.108 and p = 0.455, respectively). Similarly, LDH levels were significantly higher in Group S compared to Group C (p = 0.045) but significantly lower in Group S + CeO₂ compared to Group S (p = 0.012). No significant differences were observed for ALT, Hgb, or Hct levels among the groups (p = 0.429, p = 0.639, and p = 0.350, respectively) (Table 2).

Discussion

This study investigated the protective effects of CeO₂ against liver damage induced by sevoflurane. The findings demonstrated that CeO₂ significantly reduced histopathological damage, particularly hydropic degeneration and neutrophil infiltration, in liver tissues. While AST and LDH levels were elevated in sevoflurane-administered rats, CeO₂ treatment mitigated these increases, although the reduction in AST was not statistically significant.

Sevoflurane has been considered a relatively safe anesthetic with low hepatotoxic potential. However, cases of hepatic necrosis and inflammation associated with its use suggest a multifactorial mechanism involving oxidative stress, immune reactions, and reactive metabolites like Compound A [17,18,19]. These findings align with previous studies, such as those by Nikoll et al., who reported acute and chronic liver damage following exposure to volatile anesthetics [20].

Antioxidant agents like CeO₂ have garnered attention for their ability to scavenge free radicals and mitigate oxidative stress-related damage. Studies by Manne et al. and Amin et al. have demonstrated the efficacy of CeO₂ in reducing hepatic damage in ischemia-reperfusion and oxidative stress models [21, 22]. Similarly, the present study observed a significant reduction in LDH levels in the S + CeO₂ group compared to the sevoflurane-only group, suggesting a protective effect on hepatic cell membranes.

In this study, although the histopathological benefits of CeO₂ were evident, its effects on biochemical markers such as ALT and AST, as seen in some studies [8, 23,24,25], were less evident. This may be attributed to the relatively low hepatotoxic potential of sevoflurane and the limited duration of exposure in this study. The findings underscore the importance of histopathological evaluation alongside biochemical analysis to comprehensively assess hepatic damage.

The accumulation of CeO₂ in the liver and its stability at therapeutic doses suggest its suitability for mitigating oxidative stress in hepatic injury [26]. However, conflicting reports regarding its potential hepatotoxicity at higher doses necessitate careful dose optimization [15]. Future studies should investigate varying dosages, prolonged exposure durations, and subjects with pre-existing liver conditions to better understand the therapeutic potential of CeO₂ in clinical settings.

Conclusions

This study is of significance since it is the first experimental study on the effect of CeO2 on liver damage caused by sevoflurane. Some limitations of this study may be the duration of sevoflurane administration, the fact that the experimental group was composed of young male rats exposed to sevoflurane for the first time and examination of a limited number of parameters.

In conclusion, in this study, histopathological and biochemical changes in the livers of the sevoflurane group were detected and histopathologically a decrease in hydropic degeneration was observed in the groups that were administered CeO2. It is thought that further studies on CeO2 with experimental groups comprising subjects with different ages, sexes, and repeated exposure to sevoflurane in order to examine biochemical parameters of oxidative damage will yield more meaningful and positive results.

Data availability

“The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. There are no ethical or legal restrictions on data sharing.”

Abbreviations

ALT:

Alanine Transaminase

AST:

Aspartate Transaminase

CeO₂:

Cerium Oxide Nanoparticles

H&E:

Hematoxylin and Eosin

Hct:

Hematocrit

Hgb:

Hemoglobin

LDH:

Lactate Dehydrogenase

ROS:

Reactive Oxygen Species

References

  1. Casals E, Zeng M, Parra-Robert M, Fernández‐Varo G, Morales‐Ruiz M, Jiménez W, Casals G. Cerium oxide nanoparticles: advances in biodistribution, toxicity, and preclinical exploration. Small. 2020;16(20):1907322.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hunter RJ, Preedy VR. Nanomedicine in health and disease. New York: CRC; 2011. p. 103.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Assis MBDS, De Moraes GN, De Souza KR. Cerium oxide nanoparticles: chemical properties, biological effects and potential therapeutic opportunities. Biomedical Rep. 2024;20(3):48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Corsi F, Deidda Tarquini G, Urbani M, Bejarano I, Traversa E, Ghibelli L. The impressive anti-inflammatory activity of cerium oxide nanoparticles: more than redox? Nanomaterials. 2023;13(20):2803.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Pandey S, Kumari S, Aeshala M, L., Singh S. Investigating temperature variability on antioxidative behavior of synthesized cerium oxide nanoparticle for potential biomedical application. J Biomater Appl. 2024;38(7):866–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fu X, Li P, Chen X, Ma Y, Wang R, Ji W, Zhang Z. Ceria nanoparticles: biomedical applications and toxicity. J Zhejiang University-SCIENCE B. 2024;25(5):361–88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Yesil S, Ozdemir C, Arslan M, Gundogdu AC, Kavutcu M, Atan A. Protective effect of cerium oxide on testicular function and oxidative stress after torsion/detorsion in adult male rats. Experimental Therapeutic Med. 2022;25(1):1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Saif-Elnasr M, Samy EM, Abdel‐Khalek AF. Cerium oxide nanoparticles display antioxidant and antiapoptotic effects on gamma irradiation‐induced hepatotoxicity. Cell Biochem Funct. 2024;42(5):e4092.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chatzimentor I, Tsamesidis I, Ioannou ME, Pouroutzidou GK, Beketova A, Giourieva V, Kontonasaki E. Study of biological behavior and antimicrobial properties of cerium oxide nanoparticles. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15(10):2509.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Kharasch ED, Karol MD, Lanni C, Sawchuk R. Clinical Sevoflurane metabolism and disposition I: Sevoflurane and metabolite pharmacokinetics. Anesthesiology: J Am Soc Anesthesiologists. 1995;82(6):1369–78.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Preckel B, Bolten J. Pharmacology of modern volatile anaesthetics. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2005;19(3):331–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Turillazzi E, D’Errico S, Neri M, Riezzo I. A fatal case of fulminant hepatic necrosis following Sevoflurane anesthesia. Toxicol Pathol. 2007;35(6):780–78.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Yu W-F, Yang L-Q, Zhou M-T, Liu Z-Q, Li Q. Ca2 + cytochemical changes of hepatotoxicity caused by halothane and Sevoflurane in enzyme- induced hypoxic rats. World J Gastroenterology: WJG. 2005;11(32):5025.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Arslan M, Ozkose Z, Akyol G, Barıt G. The age-and gender-dependent effects of desflurane and Sevoflurane on rat liver. Exp Toxicol Pathol. 2010;62(1):35–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Manne ND, Arvapalli R, Nepal N, Thulluri S, Selvaraj V, Shokuhfar T, et al. Therapeutic potential of cerium oxide nanoparticles for the treatment of peritonitis induced by polymicrobial insult in Sprague-Dawley rats. Crit Care Med. 2015;43(11):477–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. McGill MR. The past and present of serum aminotransferases and the future of liver injury biomarkers. EXCLI J. 2016;15:817.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Cullen JM. Mechanistic classification of liver injury. Toxicol Pathol. 2005;33(1):6–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Watkins PB. Idiosyncratic liver injury: challenges and approaches. Toxicol Pathol. 2005;33(1):1–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Puig N, Ferrero P, Bay M, Hidalgo G, Valenti J, Amerio N, et al. Effects of Sevoflurane general anesthesia: immunological studies in mice. Int Immunopharmacol. 2002;2(1):95–104.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nicoll A, Moore D, Njoku D, Hockey B. Repeated exposure to modern volatile anaesthetics May cause chronic hepatitis as well as acute liver injury. Case Rep. 2012; bcr2012006543.

  21. Manne ND, Arvapalli R, Graffeo VA, Bandarupalli VV, Shokuhfar T, Patel S, et al. Prophylactic treatment with cerium oxide nanoparticles attenuate hepatic ischemia reperfusion injury in Sprague Dawley rats. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2017;42(5):1837–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Amin KA, Hassan MS, Awad E-S, T, Hashem KS. The protective effects of cerium oxide nanoparticles against hepatic oxidative damage induced by monocrotaline. Int J Nanomed. 2011;6:143.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ibrahim HG, Attia N, Fatma El Zahraa AH, Heneidy E. Cerium oxide nanoparticles: in pursuit of liver protection against doxorubicin- induced injury in rats. Biomed Pharmacother. 2018;103:773–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Córdoba-Jover B, Arce-Cerezo A, Ribera J, Pauta M, Oró D, Casals G, et al. Cerium oxide nanoparticles improve liver regeneration after acetaminophen- induced liver injury and partial hepatectomy in rats. J Nanobiotechnol. 2019;17(1):1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Abdel-Karim RI, Hashish RK, Badran DI, Mohammed SS, Salem NA. The ameliorative effect of cerium oxide nanoparticles on Chlorpyrifos induced hepatotoxicity in a rat model: biochemical, molecular and immunohistochemical study. J Trace Elem Med Biol. 2024;81:127346.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hirst SM, Karakoti A, Singh S, Self W, Tyler R, Seal S, et al. Bio-distribution and in vivo antioxidant effects of cerium oxide nanoparticles in mice. Environ Toxicol. 2013;28(2):107–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Fazilet Erbay: Conceptualized the study, supervised the experiments, and contributed to manuscript writing, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8764-5084. Levent Öztürk: Assisted in experimental design and contributed to manuscript writing, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9755-033X. Merve Meryem Kıran: Performed histopathological evaluations, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2498-0472. Gamze Gök: Conducted biochemical analyses and interpreted the results, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2804-5548. Mustafa Arslan: Conducted statistical analysis, contributed to data interpretation, assisted in experimental design and animal handling, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4882-5063. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fazilet Erbay.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Gazi University Experimental Animals Ethics Committee (Approval Code: G.Ü.ET-12.042, dated 08.07.2019).

Consent for publication

“Not Applicable”.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Erbay, F., Öztürk, L., Kıran, M.M. et al. The effect of cerium oxide on liver in sevoflurane-administered rats: an experimental study. BMC Anesthesiol 25, 251 (2025). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12871-025-03126-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12871-025-03126-7

Keywords