Skip to main content

Table 3 Angular motion experiment. Data is shown as mean ± standard deviation and sums (n = 24)

From: Motion resistance in peripheral oxygen saturation monitoring using Biolight Analog SpO2 compared to Masimo SpO2: a non-inferiority study

Waving Motion Group

Pace

Phase

Device A1 Waveform Disruption (0–4)

Device B2 Waveform Disruption (0–4)

Device A Technical Alarms (n)

Device B Technical Alarms (n)

Device A SpO2 Alarms (n)

Device B SpO2 Alarms (n)

120 bpm

0–20 s

2.2 ± 0.4

2.2 ± 0.3

0

0

0

0

20–40 s

0

0

0

0

40–60 s

0

0

0

0

160 bpm

0–20 s

2.4 ± 0.4

2.0 ± 0.3

0

0

0

0

20–40 s

0

0

0

0

40–60 s

0

0

0

0

2-Tap Motion Group

Pace

Phase

Device A Waveform Disruption (0–4)

Device B Waveform Disruption (0–4)

Device A Technical Alarms (n)

Device B Technical Alarms (n)

Device A SpO2 Alarms (n)

Device B SpO2 Alarms (n)

120 bpm

0–20 s

2.1 ± 0.6

2.0 ± 0.4

0

0

0

0

20–40 s

0

0

0

0

40–60 s

0

0

0

0

160 bpm

0–20 s

2.2 ± 0.5

2.1 ± 0.5

2

1

1

4

20–40 s

4

0

0

10

40–60 s

2

0

0

7

  1. 1Device A = Masimo Analog SpO2, 2Device B = Biolight Analog SpO2