- Research
- Open access
- Published:
Perioperative blood pressure variability as a risk factor for postoperative delirium in the patients receiving cardiac surgery
BMC Anesthesiology volume 24, Article number: 424 (2024)
Abstract
Background
Delirium is one of the most common neurological complications after cardiac surgery. The purpose of our study was to assess the relationship between perioperative blood pressure variability (BPV) and postoperative delirium (POD) in the patients undergoing cardiac surgery.
Methods
Adult patients received cardiac surgery and stayed in Cardiovascular Intensive Care Unit (ICU) for more than 24 h after surgery during the study period between June 2019 and December 2022 were included in this study. Baseline characteristics, perioperative hemodynamic variables and postoperative laboratory results of the cardiac patients were collected and analyzed. Perioperative BPV was quantified by calculating the standard deviation (SD) and average real variability (ARV) of blood pressure. Assessment of delirium was based on the mental status of the patients and CAM-positive. The relationship between perioperative BPV and POD was analyzed by LASSO and logistic regression using R (R package, 4.3.2).
Results
The incidence of POD was 15.0% (324/2164) in the patients receiving cardiac surgery, and the average day for POD occurred at day 3 after surgery. Patients with POD had statistically lower levels of intraoperative mean blood pressure (P = 0.015) and blood pressure ARV (P < 0.001) as well as mean blood pressure at 24 h postoperatively (P = 0.003) when compared to those without. Whereas, ARV for systolic blood pressure (8.64 vs. 7.91 mmHg, P < 0.001), diastolic blood pressure (4.00 vs. 3.77 mmHg, P = 0.014) and mean blood pressure (5.23 vs. 4.94 mmHg, P = 0.001) at 24 h postoperatively was significantly higher in the patients with POD than those without. LASSO regression and further logistic regression revealed that intraoperative blood pressure ARV (OR:0.92, P < 0.001), mean central venous pressure (OR:1.05, P = 0.048) and ARV of systolic blood pressure (OR:1.17, P = 0.002) at 24 h postoperatively were independent risk factors for POD.
Conclusions
Perioperative ARV, especially postoperative high ARV exposure, was associated with POD in the patients receiving cardiac surgery. Maintaining a relatively stable blood pressure after cardiac surgery might be beneficial to avoid POD in those patients.
Introduction
Delirium, manifested by disturbance of consciousness, irregular behavior, and inability to concentrate, is one of the most common postoperative complications in both cardiac patients and non-cardiac patients [1]. In cardiac patients, delirium is the most common neurological complications after cardiac surgery, leading to prolonged length of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) stay and hospital stay, as well as increased mortality [2]. Causes of postoperative delirium (POD) in the cardiac surgery may attribute to the use of anesthetic agents, the infection secondary to surgery procedure and cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), inflammation, etc. [3, 4].
Several studies have investigated the risk factors for POD in cardiac patients. A meta-analysis revealed the following risk factors for POD after cardiac surgery, including age, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class III or IV, preoperative depression, co-morbidities of mild cognitive impairment, diabetes and carotid artery stenosis, duration of mechanical ventilation as well as length of ICU stay [5]. However, current studies mainly focused on the baseline characteristics, surgery time and postoperative laboratory variables of the cardiac patients, studies on the influence of perioperative hemodynamic variables for POD were rare.
Recent studies dedicated to clarify the correlation between blood pressure and delirium. A post-hoc analysis for DECADE trial assessed the association between perioperative hypotension and POD after cardiac surgery and found that neither intraoperative nor postoperative hypotension were associated with delirium [6]. Whereas, blood pressure variability (BPV) was found to be associated with delirium in certain populations [7, 8]. A retrospective study by Zorko et al. revealed that BPV in the first 24 h after ICU admission was associated with an increased likelihood of delirium in the critically ill patients [9]. Another pilot study assessed the optimal mean arterial pressure (MAP) by cerebral blood flow autoregulation using ultrasound-tagged near-infrared spectroscopy during CPB procedure and the first 3 h after surgery in 110 cardiac patients [8]. This study found that the incidence and severity of delirium on postoperative day 2 was associated with excursions above the optimal MAP. Whereas, studies on the correlations between BPV and POD in the cardiac patients were insufficient.
Therefore, the purposes of our study were: 1) to investigate the association between perioperative hemodynamic variables and POD in the patients undergoing on-pump cardiac surgery; 2) to assess the relationship between perioperative BPV and POD in the cardiac patients.
Material and methods
This study was a retrospective, case–control study performed at the Cardiovascular Intensive Care Unit (CVICU) of Nanjing First Hospital, a tertiary teaching hospital affiliated to Nanjing Medical University. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University (KY20220518-01-KS-01) with a waiver of the requirement for informed consent.
Patient population
Adult cardiac patients (aged ≥ 18 years old) that received cardiac surgery and admitted to CVICU after surgery during the study period between June 2019 and December 2022 were screened for potential analysis. Those who underwent CPB procedure and received invasive blood pressure and central venous pressure (CVP) monitoring during and after surgery were included in this study. Patients were excluded from the study if they met the following criteria: 1) died during and within 48 h after surgery; 2) admitted to ICU before surgery; 3) stayed in ICU for less than 24 h after cardiac surgery; 4) received allograft orthotopic heart transplantation; 5) unable to communicate due to pre-existing stroke, dementia, and other brain diseases; 6) were receiving the therapy of psychotropic drugs before surgery; 7) complicated with stroke after surgery; 8) with missing data in hemodynamic variables, medical records, and CAM-ICU evaluation during and after surgery.
Data collection
Baseline characteristics of the cardiac patients included gender, age, body mass index (BMI), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score, European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (euroSCORE) score and co-morbidities (medical history of stroke, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease [CAD], chronic renal failure [CRF], atrial fibrillation [AF], chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD], etc.) were obtained and analyzed.
Intraoperative blood pressure measurement was continuous via invasive arterial pressure monitoring during the procedure of cardiac surgery, and the values were recorded every five minutes in the anesthesia system (DoCare). Central venous pressure (CVP) was also measured continuously via central vein or pulmonary artery catheter monitoring during the procedure of cardiac surgery and the values were recorded every five minutes. Other intraoperative variables including surgery types, surgery time, CPB time, aortic cross-clamp time and fluid balance were also recorded.
Postoperative blood pressure measurement was continuous via invasive arterial pressure monitoring after cardiac surgery during ICU stay, and the values were recorded every 30 min in the electronic medical records (EMR) database. CVP was also measured continuously after cardiac surgery during ICU stay, and the values were recorded every 30 min. Other hemodynamic variables including heart rate (HR) and pulse oxygen saturation (SpO2) were also continuously measured by ECG monitoring and recorded every 30 min. Postoperative hemodynamic variables including HR, blood pressure (BP, including systolic blood pressure [IBPs], diastolic blood pressure [IBPd] and mean blood pressure [IBPm]), CVP and SpO2 during the first 24 h after cardiac surgery were obtained and analyzed in this study. Furthermore, postoperative laboratory results at ICU admission, maximum doses of inotropic drugs within the first 24 h after ICU admission and requirement for mechanical-assisted circulation including intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) were also collected and analyzed. In addition, prognostic indexes including mechanical ventilation time, length of ICU stay and hospital stays, hospital mortality, incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) and requirement for renal replacement therapy (RRT) were also recorded for analysis.
Delirium assessment
Assessment of delirium was routinely performed by the nurses twice a day during ICU stay, and as needed after ICU discharge using confusion assessment method for ICU (CAM-ICU). First of all, the consciousness levels of the patients were assessed by Richmond Agitation-Sedation scale (RASS). After that, the mental status of the patients was evaluated with CAM-ICU in those patients with RASS score ≥ −3. The diagnosis of delirium was mainly based on the mental status of the patients. There were four characteristics of delirium diagnosis in CAM-ICU: ① acute change or fluctuation of mental state; ② Lack of concentration; ③ Disorder of thinking; ④ Changes in the level of consciousness. The patients were diagnosed with delirium when they met the characteristics of ①, ② and ③ or ④ [10].
Calculation of BPV
Intraoperative blood pressure (mean blood pressure) was recorded every five minutes during the operation and postoperative blood pressure (IBPs, IBPd and IBPm) was recorded every 30 min for the first 24 h after cardiac surgery during ICU stay. Systolic blood pressure below 40 mmHg or above 300 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure below 20 mmHg or above 150 mm Hg were set to missing and excluded from analysis. BPV was quantified by calculating the standard deviation (SD) and average real variability (ARV) of blood pressure.
The calculation formula of SD was according to the following formula as previously reported [11]:
\({x}_{i}\): blood pressure at different time point, \(\overline{x }\): mean value of blood pressure, \(n\): number of blood pressure measurements.
ARV of blood pressure was calculated based on the calculation formula that was reported in the literature and listed as follows [12]:
\({x}_{i}\): blood pressure at different time point, \({x}_{i+1}\): blood pressure at next time point, \(n\): number of blood pressure measurements.
Statistical analysis
R statistical software (R version 4.3.2) was used for statistical analysis in this study. Continuous variables were expressed as mean plus SD for those conforming to normal distribution and median plus interquartile range (IQR) for those not conforming to normal distribution. Independent-sample T test was preformed to compare the difference in the two groups for continuous variables conforming to normal distribution. For continuous variables not conforming to normal distribution, Mann–Whitney U-test was carried out to compare the difference between the two groups. Categorical variables were presented as absolute values plus proportions analyzed by Chi-square test. The Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression was adopted to screen the potential hemodynamic variables contributing to the occurrence of POD. Afterwards, multivariate logistic regression was performed and logistic regression forest plot was drawn based on the hemodynamic variables screened by LASSO analysis. Furthermore, Restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis was performed to assess the nonlinear associations between BPV and POD after cardiac surgery. Statistically significance was considered as a two-sided P < 0.05.
Results
Four thousand four hundred ninety cardiac patients who received cardiac surgery and admitted to CVICU after surgery during the study period between June 2019 and December 2022 were screened. Finally, 2164 patients were included and analyzed in our study (Fig. 1). Of all the study patients, the incidence of POD was15.0% (324/2164), and the average day for POD occurred at day 3 (1, 5) after surgery. Patients were divided into two groups based on the occurrence of POD: Delirium group (n = 324) and No Delirium group (n = 1840).
Comparison of baseline characteristics
The comparison of baseline characteristics of the patients in the two groups were presented in Table 1. Cardiac patients in the delirium group were predominantly male (237 [73.1%] vs. 1060 [57.6%], P < 0.001), with older age (69 [61, 74] vs. 65 [57, 71] years, P < 0.001), higher APACHE II score (14 [12, 17] vs. 12 [10, 15], P < 0.001) and euroSCORE (6 [5, 8] vs. 5 [4, 7], P < 0.001). Moreover, patients with co-morbidities of CAD and CRF were more likely to suffer POD when compared to those without. In terms of surgery type, cardiac patients in the delirium group had a significantly higher proportion to receive combined surgery of valve replacement/repair and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and acute Stanford Type A aortic dissection (AAAD) surgery. In addition, patients in the delirium group had markedly longer operation time (290 [249, 340] vs. 260 [220, 310] min, P < 0.001), CPB time (128 [101, 167] vs. 115 [88, 147] min, P < 0.001) and aortic cross-clamp time (85.5 [67, 114] vs. 78 [59, 103] min, P < 0.001). Besides, patients in delirium group received higher doses of inotropic drugs within 24 h after cardiac surgery when compared with those in no delirium group.
In the aspect of prognostic indexes, cardiac patients in delirium group were more likely to have prolonged time for mechanical ventilation (20.2 [13.3, 44.8] vs. 13.3 [8.8, 19.3] min, P < 0.001), longer duration of ICU stay (4 [2, 6] vs. 2 [2, 3] d, P < 0.001) and hospital stay (21 [17, 28] vs. 18 [15, 22] d, P < 0.001), as well as higher hospital mortality (29 [8.95%] vs. 50 [2.72%], P < 0.001).
Comparison of perioperative hemodynamic variables
To evaluate the association between perioperative hemodynamic variables and POD, we compared the perioperative hemodynamic variables in the two groups (Supplementary Table 1). Patients in delirium group had lower levels of intraoperative mean blood pressure (BP_mean, 64 [59, 67] vs. 64 [60, 68] mmHg, P = 0.015) and blood pressure ARV (BP_arv, 8.52 [6.40, 10.2] vs. 8.94 [7.08, 11.5] mmHg, P < 0.001) when compared to those in no delirium group.
Whereas, postoperative ARV of systolic blood pressure (8.64 [7.32, 10.2] vs. 7.91 [6.57, 9.43] mmHg, P < 0.001), diastolic blood pressure (4.00 [3.17, 4.83] vs. 3.77 [3.11, 4.60] mmHg, P = 0.014) and mean blood pressure (5.23 [4.46, 6.19] vs. 4.94 [4.11, 5.94] mmHg, P = 0.001) at 24 h after surgery was significantly higher in the patients with POD than those without.
Perioperative BPV in predicting POD
LASSO regression of the perioperative variables in predicting POD found that intraoperative BP_65_time (time of blood pressure below 65 mmHg during operation), BP_60_time (time of blood pressure below 60 mmHg during operation) and BP_arv, and mean perfusion pressure (MPP) at 6 h, 12 h postoperatively, mean CVP at 24 h postoperatively as well as ARV of systolic blood pressure and mean blood pressure at 24 h postoperatively were closely associated with POD (Fig. 2). Further logistic regression revealed that BP_arv (OR:0.92, 95%CI: 0.89–0.96, P < 0.001), mean CVP at 24 h postoperatively (OR:1.05, 95%CI: 1.00–1.10, P = 0.048) and ARV of systolic blood pressure at 24 h postoperatively (OR:1.17, 95%CI: 1.06–1.30, P = 0.002) were independent risk factors for POD (Table 2 and Fig. 3). RCS analysis revealed that, the cut-off values for BP_arv and ARV of systolic blood pressure at 24 h postoperatively were 5.640 mmHg and 5.087 mmHg, respectively (Fig. 4).
Selection of perioperative hemodynamic variables contributing to postoperative delirium using the Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression method. A Plot of LASSO coefficient profiles of the 68 variables. The log (lambda) sequence was plotted against a coefficient profile plot. There were 8 variables with non-zero coefficients generated by the ideal lambda; (B) tenfold cross-validation for LASSO model parameter adjustment. The binomial deviation curve was displayed with log (lambda). The minimum criteria and its one standard error were used to construct dotted vertical lines at the optimal values (the 1-SE criteria)
Forest plot of the perioperative hemodynamic variables in predicting postoperative delirium. OR: Odds ratio, BP_65_time: time of blood pressure below 65 mmHg during operation, BP_60_time: time of blood pressure below 60 mmHg during operation, BP_arv: average real variability (ARV) of intraoperative blood pressure, PM_MPP_6h_mean: mean perfusion pressure at 6 h postoperatively, PM_MPP_12h_mean: mean perfusion pressure at 12 h postoperatively, PM_CVPm_24h_mean: mean central venous pressure at 24 h postoperatively, PM_IBPs_24h_arv: ARV of systolic blood pressure at 24 h after surgery, PM_IBPm_24h_arv: ARV of mean blood pressure at 24 h after surgery
Restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis in assessing the nonlinear associations between perioperative blood pressure variability (BPV) and postoperative delirium after cardiac surgery. A The nonlinear associations between average real variability (ARV) of intraoperative blood pressure (BP_arv) and postoperative delirium after cardiac surgery. B The nonlinear associations between ARV of systolic blood pressure at 24 h after surgery (PM_IBPs_24h_arv) and postoperative delirium after cardiac surgery. OR: Odds ratio, 95% CI: 95% confidence interval
Discussion
We retrospectively included 2164 cardiac patients in this study and assessed the association between perioperative hemodynamic variables and the occurrence of POD after cardiac surgery. Our study found that, the incidence of POD was 15.0% in the cardiac patients receiving cardiac surgery, which was familiar to other studies [13]. Perioperative ARV rather than hypotension was closely related to POD. A low level of ARV during operation and a high level of ARV after surgery were associated with POD in the cardiac patients.
Our study revealed an association between a low level of ARV during operation and POD in the cardiac patients. The patients we included in this study were all the cardiac patients receiving CPB procedure. Therefore, the patients would experience a period of relatively constant blood pressure during the process of CPB, leading to a low ARV. As a result, ARV during operation may be greatly affected by CPB time. A longer CPB time would lead to a lower ARV during the operation. Consistently, cardiac patients that suffered POD had a significantly longer CPB time (128 min vs. 115 min, P < 0.001) when compared to those did not. Longer CPB time have been recognized as one of the independent risk factors for POD in the cardiac surgery in numerous studies [14,15,16,17], which is consistent with our results.
Recent studies have revealed a relationship between ARV and delirium in critically ill patients. A retrospective observational study by Garbajs et al. found that ARV in the first 24 h after ICU admission was associated with a higher burden of delirium during hospitalization [7]. In the surgical patients, perioperative ARV was also identified as an independent risk factor for POD in non-cardiac patients. A study by Hirsch et al. suggested that increased blood pressure fluctuation rather than relative hypotension was predictive of POD in the elderly patients undergoing major non-cardiac surgery [11]. Similarly, another recent study also showed that low intraoperative minimum blood pressure were risk factors for POD in the patients undergoing head and neck free flap reconstruction surgery [18]. Whereas, data on the association between perioperative ARV and POD in patients receiving cardiac surgery were insufficient. Our study first evaluated the relationship between perioperative ARV and POD in the cardiac patients and confirmed a close correlation between high postoperative ARV and the occurrence of early POD.
The influencing factors for ARV are various, including age, intraoperative blood loss, operation time, surgical stimulation, intravascular volume shifts, use of anesthetic agents, etc. [19]. In the patients receiving cardiac surgery, ARV is mostly affected by the intravascular volume status and the vasoactive drugs that used during the postoperative period. The potential mechanism for the association between ARV and POD might be as follows: Although the mean arterial pressure changes, cerebral perfusion could remain relatively stable within the range of cerebral perfusion pressure from 50 to 150 mmHg under normal physiological conditions. Whereas, the brain autonomic regulation might be compromised under anesthesia condition in those cardiac patients complicated with various co-morbidities. In this way, fluctuations in blood pressure may have a negative effect on the autoregulation function of the cerebrovascular vessels, leading to impaired cerebral perfusion and the occurrence of POD.
Perioperative hypotension used to be regarded as one important risk factor for POD in the patients underwent major surgeries [20, 21]. However, recent studies presented different opinions. A sub-analysis of the DECADE trial indicated that neither intraoperative or postoperative hypotension were associated with POD in the cardiac patients with CPB [6]. Another study found that increased blood pressure fluctuation rather than hypotension was predictive for POD in elderly patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery [11]. A latest meta-analysis suggested that a lower blood pressure target might be beneficial for the critically ill and perioperative patients compared with a higher blood pressure target [22]. Recently, a concept of “protective hemodynamics”, mainly focus on minimizing damage from excessive vasoconstriction over strict blood pressure targets, was raised as a clinical strategy to maintain cardiovascular stability [23]. This concept indicated that overall optimization of hemodynamic stability rather than the solely blood pressure target was more important in reducing mortality and protecting organ functions during the perioperative period for the surgical patients. Consistent with this concept, our results also convinced that reducing the fluctuation of blood pressure might be more important than elevating blood pressure in avoiding POD for the cardiac patients during the postoperative period.
Our study has several limitations that require consideration. First of all, due to the retrospective nature of this study, the time interval for blood pressure records was every 30 min after ICU admission, which was relatively fixed. In this way, we may ignore the blood pressure fluctuation outside these time points. Secondly, we only included the cardiac patients that stayed in ICU for more than 24 h after surgery in this study, leading to the exclusion of over 50% of the cardiac patients with relatively short length of ICU stay. Whereas, the incidence of POD in our study was consistent with previous studies, showing little influence on the exclusion of those patients. Lastly, we only focused on the postoperative cognitive and mental conditions of the patients in this study, the preoperative cognitive and mental conditions were not well evaluated. However, those patients with obvious cognitive disorder and unable to communicate were excluded from this study. Further large-scale prospective clinical trial might be needed to better clarify the association between perioperative BPV and POD in the patients receiving cardiac surgery.
Conclusions
Perioperative ARV, especially postoperative high ARV exposure, was associated with POD in the patients receiving cardiac surgery. Maintaining a relatively stable blood pressure after cardiac surgery might be beneficial to avoid POD in those patients.
Data availability
Data is provided within the manuscript or supplementary information files.
Abbreviations
- BPV:
-
Blood pressure variability
- POD:
-
Postoperative delirium
- ICU:
-
Intensive Care Unit
- SD:
-
Standard deviation (SD)
- ARV:
-
Average real variability
- AUT_65:
-
The area under blood pressure 65 mmHg-time curve
- AUT_60:
-
The area under blood pressure 60 mmHg-time curve
- AUT_55:
-
The area under blood pressure 55 mmHg-time curve
- AUT_50:
-
The area under blood pressure 50 mmHg-time curve
- BP_65_time:
-
Time of blood pressure < 65 mmHg
- BP_60_time:
-
Time of blood pressure < 60 mmHg
- BP_55_time:
-
Time of blood pressure < 55 mmHg
- BP_50_time:
-
Time of blood pressure < 50 mmHg
- TWA_BP_65:
-
Time-weighted average threshold value for blood pressure < 65 mmHg
- TWA_BP_60:
-
Time-weighted average threshold value for blood pressure < 60 mmHg
- TWA_BP_55:
-
Time-weighted average threshold value for blood pressure < 55 mmHg
- TWA_BP_50:
-
Time-weighted average threshold value for blood pressure < 50 mmHg
- HR:
-
Heart Rate
- IBPs:
-
Systolic blood pressure
- IBPd:
-
Diastolic blood pressure
- IBPm:
-
Mean blood pressure
- CVP:
-
Central venous pressure
- BP_mean:
-
Mean blood pressure
- BP_arv:
-
Average real variability of blood pressure
- CPB:
-
Cardiopulmonary bypass
- NYHA:
-
New York Heart Association
- MAP:
-
Mean arterial pressure
- CVICU:
-
Cardiovascular Intensive Care Unit
- BMI:
-
Body mass index
- APACHE II:
-
Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score
- euroSCORE:
-
European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation
- CAD:
-
Coronary artery disease
- CRF:
-
Chronic renal failure
- AF:
-
Atrial fibrillation
- COPD:
-
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
- EHRs:
-
Electronic health records
- BP:
-
Blood pressure
- SpO2 :
-
Pulse oxygen saturation
- IABP:
-
Intra-aortic balloon pump
- ECMO:
-
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
- AKI:
-
Acute kidney injury
- RRT:
-
Renal replacement therapy
- CAM-ICU:
-
Confusion assessment method for Intensive Care Unit
- RASS:
-
Richmond Agitation-Sedation scale
- IQR:
-
Interquartile range
- LASSO:
-
Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator
- RCS:
-
Restricted cubic spline
- CABG:
-
Coronary artery bypass grafting
- AAAD:
-
Acute Stanford Type A aortic dissection
- MPP:
-
Mean perfusion pressure
References
Jin Z, Hu J, Ma D. Postoperative delirium: perioperative assessment, risk reduction, and management. Br J Anaesth. 2020;125(4):492–504.
Pieri M, et al. Trials focusing on prevention and treatment of delirium after cardiac surgery: a systematic review of randomized evidence. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2020;34(6):1641–54.
Pang Y, et al. Effects of inflammation and oxidative stress on postoperative delirium in cardiac surgery. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022;9:1049600.
Sugimura Y, et al. Risk and consequences of postoperative delirium in cardiac surgery. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;68(5):417–24.
Chen H, et al. Risk factors of postoperative delirium after cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021;16(1):113.
Wang J, et al. Association between perioperative hypotension and postoperative delirium and atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: a post-hoc analysis of the DECADE trial. J Clin Anesth. 2022;76:110584.
Zorko Garbajs N, et al. Association of blood pressure variability with delirium in patients with critical illness. Neurocrit Care. 2023;39(3):646–54.
Hori D, et al. Blood Pressure Deviations From Optimal Mean Arterial Pressure During Cardiac Surgery Measured With a Novel Monitor of Cerebral Blood Flow and Risk for Perioperative Delirium: A Pilot Study. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2016;30(3):606–12.
Zorko Garbajs N, et al. Association of blood pressure variability with delirium in patients with critical illness. Neurocrit Care. 2022;39(3):646–54.
Inouye SK, et al. Clarifying confusion: the confusion assessment method. A new method for detection of delirium. Ann Intern Med. 1990;113(12):941–8.
Hirsch J, et al. Impact of intraoperative hypotension and blood pressure fluctuations on early postoperative delirium after non-cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2015;115(3):418–26.
Coccina F, et al. Prognostic value of average real variability of systolic blood pressure in elderly treated hypertensive patients. Blood Press Monit. 2019;24(4):179–84.
Huet O, et al. Prevention of post-operative delirium using an overnight infusion of dexmedetomidine in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a pragmatic, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Crit Care. 2024;28(1):64.
Andrási TB, et al. Risk factors for postoperative delirium after cardiac surgical procedures with cardioplegic arrest. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022;62(1):ezab570.
Ushio M, et al. Timing, Threshold, and Duration of Intraoperative Hypotension in Cardiac Surgery: Their Associations With Postoperative Delirium. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2022;36(11):4062–9.
Brown CH, et al. Effect of targeting mean arterial pressure during cardiopulmonary bypass by monitoring cerebral autoregulation on postsurgical delirium among older patients: a nested randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg. 2019;154(9):819–26.
Baron Shahaf D, et al. Association Between Risk of Stroke and Delirium After Cardiac Surgery and a New Electroencephalogram Index of Interhemispheric Similarity. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2023;37(9):1691–9.
Ooms M, et al. Influence of perioperative blood pressure regulation on postoperative delirium in patients undergoing head and neck free flap reconstruction. Eur J Med Res. 2023;28(1):365.
Rothwell PM. Does blood pressure variability modulate cardiovascular risk? Curr Hypertens Rep. 2011;13(3):177–86.
Wesselink EM, et al. Intraoperative hypotension and delirium after on-pump cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2015;115(3):427–33.
Wesselink EM, et al. Intraoperative hypotension and delirium among older adults undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021;69(11):3177–85.
D’Amico F, et al. Low Versus High Blood Pressure Targets in Critically Ill and Surgical Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Crit Care Med. 2024;52(9):1427–38.
D’Amico F, Landoni G. Protective hemodynamics: a novel strategy to manage blood pressure. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2024;30(6):629–36.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
This study was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (82372217) and Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20231128). The funding agency had no role in study design, the collection of data, in the interpretation of data, in the writing of the article, or in the decision to submit the article for publication.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
XS and HT contributed to design, data acquisition, statistical analysis and drafted the manuscript. WXC and JKS contributed to data acquisition, data analysis and presentation. RHJ and WHZ contributed to data acquisition and data analysis. LH and CZ contributed to study control, study design and manuscript drafting. CZ contributed to manuscript drafting and revision. XS and HT contributed equally to the paper. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University (KY20220518-01-KS-01) with a waiver of the requirement for informed consent.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Shen, X., Tao, H., Chen, W. et al. Perioperative blood pressure variability as a risk factor for postoperative delirium in the patients receiving cardiac surgery. BMC Anesthesiol 24, 424 (2024). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12871-024-02817-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12871-024-02817-x