Skip to main content
Fig. 3 | BMC Anesthesiology

Fig. 3

From: A comparison of McGrath MAC, AIRWAY SCOPE®, and AceScope® video laryngoscopes in novice healthcare providers: a randomized crossover simulation study

Fig. 3

the box-and-whisker plots delineating the perceived ease of use for the McGrath MAC, AIRWAY SCOPE, AceScope video laryngoscopes, as assessed by 60 participants employing a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Upon completion of all six scenarios, the participants evaluated the facility of tracheal intubation for each of the three devices utilizing a VAS, where a score of 0 signified “extremely easy” and 10 indicated “highly challenging”. The comparative analysis revealed no statistically significant differences among the three devices concerning their ease of use. McGrath MAC: Median VAS score = 6 (IQR: 4–8), AIRWAY SCOPE: Median VAS score = 7 (IQR: 5–9), AceScope: Median VAS score = 6 (IQR: 4–8)

Back to article page

BMC Anesthesiology

ISSN: 1471-2253

Contact us