Skip to main content

Table 2 Difficult airway alert appropriateness vs. quality components

From: Assessing the efficacy of difficult airway alerts in electronic medical records: a quality improvement study

 

All Alerts

(N = 141)

Appropriate

(N = 117)

Inappropriate

(N = 24)

Odds Ratio

(OR)

P-Value

High Quality Alert^

40 (28%)

36 (31%)

4 (17%)

2.22 [0.71–6.97]

0.171

- Standardized Alert

90 (64%)

75 (64%)

15 (63%)

1.07 [0.43–2.66]

0.882

- Contains Information

105 (74%)

89 (76%)

16 (67%)

1.59 [0.62–4.11]

0.339

- QLD Criteria

65 (46%)

57 (49%)

8 (33%)

1.90 [0.76–4.78]

0.173

- Direct Link

29 (21%)

24 (21%)

5 (21%)

0.98 [0.33–2.89]

0.972

  1. Data presented as: events (percentage), and odds ratio [95% confidence interval]
  2. ^ Defined as whether the alert would be useful in the event of emergent airway management by the following composite criteria: whether the alert utilized the standard alert type, so that it appears correctly within the electronic medical record; whether the alert was populated with relevant information (i.e. wasn’t blank); and whether the information within the alert contained at least one suggested indication for creation of a difficult airway alert by Queensland Health guidelines, endorsed by the Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists (Fig. 3) [8]